Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:24
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Do you realize people believe that story about Taylor Swift? Do you not say it is satire?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What To Expect in the Markets This Week - Investopedia
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are some reasons why some people may be against stay-at-home dads or working moms?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sex advice: I'm finally ready to enter my promiscuity era. But there's a catch. - Slate Magazine
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Men more likely than women to orgasm from anal penetration, study finds - PsyPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.